Gorean Living User Forums • View topic - Liar? Potential rapo? You be the judge!

From CS Mail, meaning that all manner of punctuation and parts of words that the mail system even thinks might be posting a url is edited out, so a lot of the funky formatting, missing parts of words, and lack of punctuation is due to that.

Just another liar and/or potential rapist. I finally pasted my response to my list of paste replies, so I don't have to type it all out any more. Just change a couple key words.

(My commentary like this)

Commentary = stuff I added for you, the readers, rather than part of the original message exchange.

Male Dominant
[Northeast City & State]
US
[early 40s]
Hetero
Recent Message History:

asshat on 12/29/19 at 12:20 PM:
Can we text

KhaosWolfKat on 12/29/19 at 1:06 PM:
Did you read my profile?

asshat on 12/29/19 at 1:09 PM:
Yes why

(Because my profile addresses your first question, asshat, but I'll clarify, just to be sure you're being an asshat, rather than just not knowing the difference between texting and site based messages.)

KhaosWolfKat on 1/3/20 at 9:25 PM:
What do you mean by text?
You mean message on here, or actual phone text?

(3.. 2... 1...)

asshat on 1/4/20 at 3:14 AM:
Phone Text

(Shocker.)

asshat on 1/4/20 at 8:37 AM:
Phone text

(No need to send it twice, impatient dillweed. SOME of us have things to do in the morning and are asleep at 3 in the morning.)

KhaosWolfKat on 1/4/20 at 1:51 PM:
I see
If you actually read my profile, like you said you had, you would know why I was asking, or at least you would have some clue

Because if you had read my profile, you would have seen what I wrote about personal contact in[form]ation

That means you are either a liar and you did NOT read my profile, or that you read it, but do not care about my clearly stated boundaries, or think they do not apply to you, suggesting you are entitled and selfish, at best

So, which is it?
Are you a liar or an entitled, selfish, potential rapist?

(They always love this question!)

KhaosWolfKat on 1/4/20 at 1:54 PM:
ination should have been i n f o r m a t i o n
The system doesnt like part of that word and censors it

(Fucking CS.)

KhaosWolfKat on 1/5/20 at 12:32 PM:
Are you going to tell me which one it is?

(Nope. Not gonna embrace the crickets and let you just slink away.)

asshat on 1/5/20 at 1:24 PM:
Its none of them

(Pull the other one. It's got bells on.)

KhaosWolfKat on 1/5/20 at 6:19 PM:
Oh really?

Then do, please, tell me why you asked to do something that I specifically said in my profile that I will not do

Because it seems to me that if you did read it, you would know that I said no to that

How do you explain?

(Oh PLEASE try to mansplain this to me, Sparky, so I can let you have it with both barrels! OK, an apology and copping to it would also be quite acceptable, but how likely is that?)

asshat on 1/5/20 at 6:26 PM:
Cause I wanna chat w u

KhaosWolfKat on 1/5/20 at 6:57 PM:
That still does not answer what I asked

Unless you feel your desires are more important than my boundaries?

Perhaps I simply fail to understand your logic and rationale on this one, so you should explain it to me

(And he read it shortly after it was sent, but no reply since. Coward.)

on 1/7/20 at 8:54 AM:
That is what I thought

Pro tip
Actually read profiles and respect the boundaries people state
And when you are caught out for not doing so, simply apologise and do better, rather than trying to lie your way out of it

Or keep trying it your way and wondering why you strike out repeatedly

(I'm predicting he chooses this option.)

Forum rules

< Return to Sender - GL ~ Liar? Potential rapo? You be the judge!