Gorean Living User Forums • View topic - Obedient ≠ Following rules, apparently

From IRC

This charming fellow PMd me the very second I joined a chat room, in which the MAIN rule is no PMs without asking in channel first. His username implies he has a large penis, so we'll call him Buku Inches Turgid Cock Hammer - BITCH for short.

(My commentary like this)
Commentary = stuff I added for you, the readers, rather than part of the original message exchange.

[14:43:56] Common channels with BITCH: #chat, #sub/Dom

[14:43:56] <BITCH> Hello Mistress

[14:46:47] <KhaosWolfKat> Are you literate?

[14:47:29] <BITCH> Yes Ma'am

[14:48:23] <KhaosWolfKat> Are you intelligent?

[14:48:47] <BITCH> Yes Ma'am

[14:49:50] <KhaosWolfKat> Are you visually impaired?

[14:51:03] <BITCH> No Ma'am

[14:52:05] <KhaosWolfKat> Do you know how to properly follow directions?

[14:52:15] <BITCH> Yes Ma'am

[14:52:34] <KhaosWolfKat> OK. So.. We have determined that you are perfectly cabable of reading the rules and following them...

[14:52:52] <BITCH> Yes Ma'am I am sorry

[14:53:26] <KhaosWolfKat> Which means the only possible conclusion to which I can come is that you specifically CHOSE to disregard them.

[14:54:28] <BITCH> Im sorry Ma'am

[14:54:29] <KhaosWolfKat> Good to know.

[14:55:22] <KhaosWolfKat> No you're not. You're just sorry you got called out for it.

[14:56:55] <KhaosWolfKat> What were you hoping for when you messaged me?

[14:57:35] <BITCH> To worship your feet

[15:08:04] BITCH has quit (Read error).

(He quit when he got kicked from the channel in question, cause I ratted him out.)

Forum rules

< Return to Sender - GL ~ Obedient ≠ Following rules, apparently